Should The Atomic Bomb Be Justified - 1771 Words

In order for an action to be deemed as justifiable, it must be deemed as right, and not in one’s self-interest. This action is the defining characteristic of justifiability, yet many complications can arise that would limit its justifiability. Such is the case of the dropping of the atomic bomb. For decades, there has been an ongoing debate about whether or not America’s action of dropping two atomic bombs on Japan was justified. The atomic bomb is a bomb that derives its destructive power from the rapid release of nuclear energy by fission of heavy atomic nuclei, causing damage through heat, blast, and radioactivity (dictionary.reference.com). While the United States’ action is perceived to be inhumane and unjustifiable, ultimately it is inhumane, but justifiable as well. This was the most cost effective way to end the war, leading to many more survivors. It kept a potentially dangerous state from misbehaving, decreasing the chance of opposition. The effects on Japan discouraged future use of this weapon. It is for these reasons that America’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan was justifiable. While many would argue that the atomic bomb was an expensive tool to develop and caused excessive damage, there is an inordinate amount of evidence suggesting that it was the most cost effective way to end the war. Primarily, the use of the atomic bomb replaced thousands of U.S. bombing missions that would have been required to achieve the same effect of the twoShow MoreRelatedA Closer Look at the Bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki1485 Words   |  6 Pageshistory was changed. Two atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima, and three days later, August 9, 1945, on Nagasaki that ended World War II. Japan had already been a defeated nation from conventional bombs and World War II. Many innocent lives were lost, psychological scars were left on the lives of the bomb survivors, and thus many lives were changed forever. The atomic bombings caused many people to have genetic effects due to the radiation from the bombs. Revisionists have saidRead More Drop The Bo mb? Essay656 Words   |  3 Pages U.S. History - Grech Atomic Bombs Dropped on Japan, Justified? nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;On August 6th and 9th of 1945 U.S. bombers dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing utter destruction and many deaths. These bombs were dropped as the Pacific battles of World War II were coming to an end. Soon after Japan surrendered, ending the war. But, was the use of atomic warfare necessary? Was it too harsh and cruel to the JapaneseRead MoreHarry Trumans Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb1314 Words   |  6 Pagesto drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified? A. Plan of Investigation Research Question: To what extent was Harry Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified? This investigation assesses President Harry Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It will determine whether or not his decision was justified. This investigation will scrutinize the reasons that made Harry Truman feel inclined to drop atomic bombs over HiroshimaRead MoreOn August 6, 1945, The United States Of America Dropped1173 Words   |  5 Pages On August 6, 1945, the United States of America dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. For decades, there have been feuds relating to the justification of the bombing. Was the U.S justified? It depends on your vantage point. The United States was justified due to the unprovoked attack and bombing of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, which occurred three years prior to the bombing of Hiroshima, it was necessary to stop the war because it saved thousands of American lives. Until then, the fight had neverRead MoreThe United States Was Justified in Dropping the Atomic Bombs on Japan1244 Words   |  5 Page sStates of America dropped the Atomic Bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The use of these bombs brought a quick end to World War 2, yet caused extensive damage to the two Japanese cities. There have often been disputes as to whether the USA was justified in the dropping of the atomic bombs because of the damage they caused, not only to the cities, but to the people of Japan as well. Many people believe that the USA should not have dropped the bombs because of the damage they causedRead MorePresident Truman and the First Atomic Bomb Essay1193 Words   |  5 PagesAtomic Bomb Essay In 1945, World War Two was coming to an end. Following Adolf Hitler’s suicide, and Nazi Germany’s unconditional surrender on May 7, 1945, the war in Europe was finally over. The allies began began postwar planning for future, as well as establishment of post-war order and peace treaties issues. America’s war wasn’t done yet as they were still fighting Japan, eventually pushing them back to their main islandRead MoreShould We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb?1180 Words   |  5 PagesShould we have dropped the atomic bomb? On August 6, 1945, the United States of America dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. For decades, there have been feuds relating to the justification of the bombing. Was the U.S justified? It depends on your vantage point. The United States was justified due to the unprovoked attack and bombing of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, which occurred three years prior to the bombing of Hiroshima, it was necessary to stop the war because it saved thousands of AmericanRead More Use of the Atomic Bomb Against Japan was Justified Essay1137 Words   |  5 PagesUse of the Atomic Bomb Against Japan was Justified The use of the atomic bomb against Japan was completely justified in both cause and impact. An intense weapon was necessary to force a quick Japanese surrender. The bomb saved thousands upon thousands of American and Japanese lives that would have been lost if the war continued or an invasion occurred. The bomb was the only way to end the suffering of the millions who were being held captive by the Japanese oppressor. The weapon of massRead MoreShould The Us Dropped Atomic Bombs On Japan?1183 Words   |  5 PagesShould the US dropped atomic bombs on Japan? By- Daniel Hernandez On August 6, 1945, the United States of America dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. For decades, there have been feuds relating to the justification of the bombing. Was the U.S justified? It depends on your opinion. The United States was justified due to the unprovoked attack and bombing of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, which occurred three years prior to the bombing of Hiroshima, it was necessary to stop the war because it savedRead MoreThe Enola Gay1506 Words   |  7 Pagesthe atomic bomb on Hiroshima. August 6, 1945 was a historic day. Lives were lost and it was the start of the very end of World War ll. The use of this very destructive weapon could be seen as inhumane, but it was a decision that had to be made. Americans and people from other countries today have their own opinion of our war ending tactic. What is important to think about is that sometimes tough decisions have to be made for the greater good of everyone. The use of the Enola Gay was justified in that

Explain the personal attributes valued by employers of IT personnel Free Essays

I am working in careers advice for IT personnel. I have been asked to produce a small booklet on valued employee attributes and communication barriers. I will write a report explaining the personal attributes valued by employers. We will write a custom essay sample on Explain the personal attributes valued by employers of IT personnel or any similar topic only for you Order Now Attitudes Determination Determination is very important in the workplace as it shows that they are able to get on and complete the work without getting distracted. Determination is also great when facing problems as the employee will be determined to finish the task and will try everything to overcome any problems that may prevent them from their end goal. Whilst on my internship at BP I was very determined to finish the work and I didn’t allow anything to distract me from completing the work. This allowed me to complete more work in the time frame I was given which was very useful to my team. Independence Independence is also a very important soft skill to have in the workplace. Employees will be expected to complete tasks on their own without any help from others. Employees need to think for themselves and not rely on other people to tell them what they have to do next. At BP I showed independence by making meetings with people I needed specific information rather than waiting for someone to come to me. Also when I was given tasks, I would work on it alone and if I got to problems I would try to overcome them on my own. Planning skills Planning is important in the workplace it involves thinking ahead to decide what you need to do to achieve a goal within a given timescale. It’s important in planning that goals are established, strategies and objectives are decided to be successful. By planning tasks can be done in the time given. Whilst at BP I showed planning skills by looking at the tasks I had and then planning how I was going to compete the tasks. Such as drawing diagrams or writing down the formulas and where I was going to use them in my excel sheets. Time management To make the best use of your time, you need to manage it effectively. To do this you have to take control on your time and plan when you are going to complete things by; using a diary would help. Also you need to make sure that time is protected from interruptions and make sure you are strict on time making sure vital tasks are done before doing less important things. Being good at time management will be useful because it will mean that tasks will be done for the deadline and the employee will never be late for meetings or for work which means that work can be done when it’s needed. On my internship I showed time management skills by planning my tasks for specific times and making sure I had it done by the deadline. Also making sure if I had meetings in another building I left enough time to get there to make sure I wasn’t late. Specific Attributes Job For some jobs technical knowledge will be needed. for instance in my job at BP I needed to have knowledge on IT programs such as Microsoft, PowerPoint, Excel, Outlook and also needed to have knowledge on SharePoint which is used for online storage. An employee might demonstrate technical skills by taking and passing academic or vocational qualifications, or you might have a certificate to prove that you have a special skill; such as ICT Qualifications. Health and safety If an employee is unwell then they should stay off work until they are recovered. Coming into work sick will then make everyone else sick and in order to prevent this they need to get better at home. The Health and Safety at Work Act requires all employees to ‘take reasonable care of themselves and others who could be affected by what they do’. This Act also states that if you are an employee who has ‘been injured at work, seen a dangerous occurrence, or your doctor has certified that you have a work-related reportable disease, you must inform your employer’. How to cite Explain the personal attributes valued by employers of IT personnel, Papers

Carbon Taxes versus Tradable Permits-Free-Samples for Students

Question: Write a report on Carbon Taxes versus Tradeable Permits. Answer: Introduction The Carbon Taxes and Tradable Permits are the policies which are implemented by the government in order to bring Green solutions into use. Its aim is to reduce the gas emissions and global warming which is caused due to its use. This report includes a brief description about Carbon Taxes and Tradable Permits and the manner in which these policies work along with the diagrams to illustrate the working of these policies. It also includes a clear comparison between the two policies. Meaning of Carbon (Emission) Taxes and Tradable Permits and how it works The tax which is imposed on the carbon content of the fuels is called as Carbon Tax. To encourage green practices among households and industrialized companies and for promoting investments in cleaner technologies and discouraging fossil fuel emission the same is being imposed (David Suzuki Foundation, 2017) It is levied on the production, distribution or use of fossil fuels based on how much carbon their combustion emits. To reduce its consumption government sets price per ton on carbon and then translate the same into a tax (Dowdy, 2017). By imposing tax on carbon consumers and producers are given monetary incentive to reduce their carbon emissions. (Source: U.S. Department of Energy, 2004) Figure 2: Gasoline Price Versus Use in industrial Countries, 2003 Tradable permit system is a pollution control tool in which an overall limit which is called as cap is imposed by the government for controlling the overall level of carbon pollution. When the cap decreases every year (as per the limit fixed by the government) it emphasizes the polluters to buy the unused quota from other companies because they have exceeded their emissions. The economic incentive given to companies leads to lower pollution through emissions and support clean energy (David Suzuki Foundation, 2017). (Source: Gordon, 2012) The above figure explains the working of both the policies in which point A will generate emission equal to quantity (Q0) and the price will be (P0). Now the government wants to reduce the quantity to Q1. In Carbon Tax amount of tax is added to the price and the price will increase to P1. And, in case of Cap-and-trade the government restricts emissions to Q1. The quantity is determined by the Cap and the price will increase to P1. The difference between both the working is of T. In case of Carbon Tax, T goes to government but in case of Cap it is a pure profit (Gordon, 2012) Carbon Taxes versus Tradable Permits The environmental and economic effectiveness depends upon how the system is being designed. The carbon tax policy for taxing fuels is quicker for governments to implement since it is easy to rely on the existing administrative structures and can be implemented in lesser time but in case of tradable permits more time is required to formulate the required regulations and they are more prone to loopholes. And an emission trading market is also required to be established. The amount of emissions reductions can be provided with more certainty in case of cap and floor based system rather than carbon tax because it can only provide the price with certainty and not the amount. The advantage of tradable permits is that it encourages the least cost carbon reduction and the nations which are developing can convert the permits into an export commodity and thus selling the permits to the industrialised nations who are unable to meet their reduction requirements. One of the drawbacks of selling permits is that the nation would be able to continue the emissions at current level by buying permits.(Harris JM Codur AM,2012) When the effect on prices are considered then Carbon Tax is an appropriate policy but if the concern is on quantity Cap-and-trade System is effective since it provides assurance that the targets will b met.(Gordan,2012) Conclusion Whether the carbon tax or the tradable permits is a best way for pollution control is a big debatable discussion. The simple answer to which is the manner in which the system is designed. Both the programs work well and are designed accordingly to support its objective. The more familiar type of policy tool is carbon taxes over the tradable permits since it can be easily executed using the existing administrative equipment. Deployment of tradable permits is rising in the United States and the results of using the same have been positive. The developed countries all over the world are encouraging the implementation of the tradable permits. (Norregaard Hill, 2000). References David Suzuki Foundation. (2017). Carbon Tax or Cap-and-trade. Retrieved from https://www.davidsuzuki.org/issues/climate-change/science/climate-solutions/carbon-tax-or-cap-and-trade/ Dowdy, S. (2017). How carbon tax works. Retrieved from https://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science/carbon-tax.htm Forest Carbon Management. (2017). Tradable Permit System https://fcm.sgrc.selkirk.ca/carbon-economy/tradable-permit-system/ Gordan, S. (2012).What you need to know about carbon taxes and cap-and-trade. Retrieved from https://www.macleans.ca/economy/business/why-the-difference-between-carbon-taxes-and-cap-and-trade-isnt-as-important-as-you-think/ Harris, JM. Codur, AM. (2012). Policy responses to climate change. Retrieved from https://editors.eol.org/eoearth/wiki/Policy_responses_to_climate_change Norregaard, J. Hill, VR. (2017). Controlling pollution using taxes and tradable permits. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/issues/issues25/index.ht